11,676 research outputs found
A simple formula for the average gate fidelity of a quantum dynamical operation
This note presents a simple formula for the average fidelity between a
unitary quantum gate and a general quantum operation on a qudit, generalizing
the formula for qubits found by Bowdrey et al [Phys. Lett. A 294, 258 (2002)].
This formula may be useful for experimental determination of average gate
fidelity. We also give a simplified proof of a formula due to Horodecki et al
[Phys. Rev. A 60, 1888 (1999)], connecting average gate fidelity to
entanglement fidelity.Comment: 3 pages, references and discussion of prior work update
Universal quantum computation using only projective measurement, quantum memory, and preparation of the 0 state
What resources are universal for quantum computation? In the standard model,
a quantum computer consists of a sequence of unitary gates acting coherently on
the qubits making up the computer. This paper shows that a very different model
involving only projective measurements, quantum memory, and the ability to
prepare the |0> state is also universal for quantum computation. In particular,
no coherent unitary dynamics are involved in the computation.Comment: 4 page
Optical quantum computation using cluster states
We propose an approach to optical quantum computation in which a
deterministic entangling quantum gate may be performed using, on average, a few
hundred coherently interacting optical elements (beamsplitters, phase shifters,
single photon sources, and photodetectors with feedforward). This scheme
combines ideas from the optical quantum computing proposal of Knill, Laflamme
and Milburn [Nature 409 (6816), 46 (2001)], and the abstract cluster-state
model of quantum computation proposed by Raussendorf and Briegel [Phys. Rev.
Lett. 86, 5188 (2001)].Comment: 4 page
Another Approach to Consensus and Maximally Informed Opinions with Increasing Evidence
Merging of opinions results underwrite Bayesian rejoinders to complaints about the subjective nature of personal probability. Such results establish that sufficiently similar priors achieve consensus in the long run when fed the same increasing stream of evidence. Initial subjectivity, the line goes, is of mere transient significance, giving way to intersubjective agreement eventually. Here, we establish a merging result for sets of probability measures that are updated by Jeffrey conditioning. This generalizes a number of different merging results in the literature. We also show that such sets converge to a shared, maximally informed opinion. Convergence to a maximally informed opinion is a (weak) Jeffrey conditioning analogue of Bayesian “convergence to the truth” for conditional probabilities. Finally, we demonstrate the philosophical significance of our study by detailing applications to the topics of dynamic coherence, imprecise probabilities, and probabilistic opinion pooling
Obligation, Permission, and Bayesian Orgulity
This essay has two aims. The first is to correct an increasingly popular way of misunderstanding Belot's Orgulity Argument. The Orgulity Argument charges Bayesianism with defect as a normative epistemology. For concreteness, our argument focuses on Cisewski et al.'s recent rejoinder to Belot. The conditions that underwrite their version of the argument are too strong and Belot does not endorse them on our reading. A more compelling version of the Orgulity Argument than Cisewski et al. present is available, however---a point that we make by drawing an analogy with de Finetti's argument against mandating countable additivity. Having presented the best version of the Orgulity Argument, our second aim is to develop a reply to it. We extend Elga's idea of appealing to finitely additive probability to show that the challenge posed by the Orgulity Argument can be met
Simulating Hamiltonian dynamics using many-qudit Hamiltonians and local unitary control
When can a quantum system of finite dimension be used to simulate another
quantum system of finite dimension? What restricts the capacity of one system
to simulate another? In this paper we complete the program of studying what
simulations can be done with entangling many-qudit Hamiltonians and local
unitary control. By entangling we mean that every qudit is coupled to every
other qudit, at least indirectly. We demonstrate that the only class of
finite-dimensional entangling Hamiltonians that aren't universal for simulation
is the class of entangling Hamiltonians on qubits whose Pauli operator
expansion contains only terms coupling an odd number of systems, as identified
by Bremner et. al. [Phys. Rev. A, 69, 012313 (2004)]. We show that in all other
cases entangling many-qudit Hamiltonians are universal for simulation
- …